Topics in this domain

Risk Acceptance: Approval, Expiry and Review

Risk treatment · 2 min read

Acceptance is a decision

Sometimes the best answer is to live with a risk: treatment costs more than the risk, a fix is coming later, or the risk is simply small. That’s legitimate, as long as someone with the authority decides knowingly, writes it down and looks at it again. Ignoring a risk, or not knowing about it, isn’t acceptance.

Who may accept

Low risk accepted by owner (12 months), medium by BU head (6), high by executive (3), beyond appetite by board only.

The bigger the risk, the more senior the approver and the shorter the period before review. A typical scheme:

Residual riskWho may acceptMaximum period
LowAsset or process owner12 months
MediumBusiness unit head6 months
HighAn executive, after steering committee review3 months
Beyond appetiteThe board or its risk committee onlyUntil treated; reviewed at every meeting

The security manager advises and records, but doesn’t accept business risk on the owner’s behalf.

The acceptance process

Request, assess, approve, record, review.
  1. Request: the owner explains the risk and why it can’t be treated now.
  2. Assess: security confirms the rating, the options and any compensating controls.
  3. Approve at the right level of authority.
  4. Record in the risk register: owner, reason, conditions, compensating controls and expiry date.
  5. Review at expiry, or sooner if things change: renew, treat or close.

Policy exceptions are acceptances too

When someone can’t comply with a policy or standard, the exception is a risk acceptance and follows the same process.

Example. A laboratory instrument runs an old operating system that can’t take the standard endpoint agent. The lab head requests an exception. Security adds network isolation as a compensating control, and the business unit head approves it for six months while the vendor certifies a newer version.

Keeping acceptances honest

  • Keep one register of all accepted risks and exceptions.
  • Send reminders before expiry.
  • Report accepted risks to the steering committee regularly, so management sees the total.
  • Reassess immediately if threats or the system change.
  • Close the acceptance when the risk is treated.

How the exam asks about it

If the question asks…The answer is usually…
Requirement for valid risk acceptanceInformed, documented approval at the right level
Who accepts a risk beyond appetite?The board / senior management
What every acceptance should includeOwner, reason, conditions and an expiry or review date
A request for a policy exceptionAssess the risk, approve at the right level, time-limit it
An accepted risk changesReassess the acceptance

In short

  • Risk acceptance is a legitimate, deliberate decision to retain a risk; it must be informed, documented and approved.
  • The approver's seniority depends on the size of the risk; risks beyond appetite need the board or its committee.
  • Each acceptance records the owner, the reason, any compensating controls and conditions, and an expiry date.
  • Policy exceptions are a form of risk acceptance and follow the same process.
  • Acceptances are reviewed at expiry and whenever the risk changes, and are then renewed, treated or closed.
  • The security manager tracks and reports accepted risks so they don't become forgotten permanent gaps.

Exam traps

  • The CISO doesn't accept risks for the business; the owner or management does.
  • Acceptance without an expiry or review date tends to become permanent.
  • An exception approved by someone without enough authority isn't valid acceptance.
  • Accepting a risk doesn't mean forgetting it; it stays in the register and is monitored.

Slides

Click the slide and use the arrow keys. F toggles full screen.

CISM · Domain 2 · Risk treatment

Risk Acceptance: Approval, Expiry and Review

How to accept risk properly: who may approve it, what must be recorded, how policy exceptions fit in, and why every acceptance needs an expiry date.

1 / 9